模型:
TheBloke/WizardCoder-15B-1.0-GGML
Chat & support: my new Discord server
Want to contribute? TheBloke's Patreon page
These files are GGML format model files for WizardLM's WizardCoder 15B 1.0 .
Please note that these GGMLs are not compatible with llama.cpp, or currently with text-generation-webui . Please see below for a list of tools known to work with these model files.
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request ### Instruction: prompt ### Response:
Matt Hoeffner has put up a live Space with a demo of this model:
These files are not compatible with llama.cpp.
Currently they can be used with:
As other options become available I will endeavour to update them here (do let me know in the Community tab if I've missed something!)
Name | Quant method | Bits | Size | Max RAM required | Use case |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WizardCoder-15B-1.0.ggmlv3.q4_0.bin | q4_0 | 4 | 10.75 GB | 13.25 GB | 4-bit. |
WizardCoder-15B-1.0.ggmlv3.q4_1.bin | q4_1 | 4 | 11.92 GB | 14.42 GB | 4-bit. Higher accuracy than q4_0 but not as high as q5_0. However has quicker inference than q5 models. |
WizardCoder-15B-1.0.ggmlv3.q5_0.bin | q5_0 | 5 | 13.09 GB | 15.59 GB | 5-bit. Higher accuracy, higher resource usage and slower inference. |
WizardCoder-15B-1.0.ggmlv3.q5_1.bin | q5_1 | 5 | 14.26 GB | 16.76 GB | 5-bit. Even higher accuracy, resource usage and slower inference. |
WizardCoder-15B-1.0.ggmlv3.q8_0.bin | q8_0 | 8 | 20.11 GB | 22.61 GB | 8-bit. Almost indistinguishable from float16. High resource use and slow. Not recommended for most users. |
For further support, and discussions on these models and AI in general, join us at:
Thanks to the chirper.ai team!
I've had a lot of people ask if they can contribute. I enjoy providing models and helping people, and would love to be able to spend even more time doing it, as well as expanding into new projects like fine tuning/training.
If you're able and willing to contribute it will be most gratefully received and will help me to keep providing more models, and to start work on new AI projects.
Donaters will get priority support on any and all AI/LLM/model questions and requests, access to a private Discord room, plus other benefits.
Special thanks to : Luke from CarbonQuill, Aemon Algiz, Dmitriy Samsonov.
Patreon special mentions : Oscar Rangel, Eugene Pentland, Talal Aujan, Cory Kujawski, Luke, Asp the Wyvern, Ai Maven, Pyrater, Alps Aficionado, senxiiz, Willem Michiel, Junyu Yang, trip7s trip, Sebastain Graf, Joseph William Delisle, Lone Striker, Jonathan Leane, Johann-Peter Hartmann, David Flickinger, Spiking Neurons AB, Kevin Schuppel, Mano Prime, Dmitriy Samsonov, Sean Connelly, Nathan LeClaire, Alain Rossmann, Fen Risland, Derek Yates, Luke Pendergrass, Nikolai Manek, Khalefa Al-Ahmad, Artur Olbinski, John Detwiler, Ajan Kanaga, Imad Khwaja, Trenton Dambrowitz, Kalila, vamX, webtim, Illia Dulskyi.
Thank you to all my generous patrons and donaters!
This is the Full-Weight of WizardCoder.
Repository : https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder
Twitter : https://twitter.com/WizardLM_AI/status/1669109414559911937
Paper : Is coming, with brand-new Evol+ methods for code LLMs.
Demos (Only support code-related English instructions now.) :
Demo , Backup Demo1 , Backup Demo2 , Backup Demo3
To develop our WizardCoder model, we begin by adapting the Evol-Instruct method specifically for coding tasks. This involves tailoring the prompt to the domain of code-related instructions. Subsequently, we fine-tune the Code LLM, StarCoder, utilizing the newly created instruction-following training set.
? The following figure shows that our WizardCoder attains the third position in this benchmark , surpassing Claude-Plus (59.8 vs. 53.0) and Bard (59.8 vs. 44.5). Notably, our model exhibits a substantially smaller size compared to these models.
❗ Note: In this study, we copy the scores for HumanEval and HumanEval+ from the LLM-Humaneval-Benchmarks . Notably, all the mentioned models generate code solutions for each problem utilizing a single attempt , and the resulting pass rate percentage is reported. Our WizardCoder generates answers using greedy decoding and tests with the same code .
The following table clearly demonstrates that our WizardCoder exhibits a substantial performance advantage over all the open-source models. ❗ If you are confused with the different scores of our model (57.3 and 59.8), please check the Notes.
Model | HumanEval Pass@1 | MBPP Pass@1 |
---|---|---|
CodeGen-16B-Multi | 18.3 | 20.9 |
CodeGeeX | 22.9 | 24.4 |
LLaMA-33B | 21.7 | 30.2 |
LLaMA-65B | 23.7 | 37.7 |
PaLM-540B | 26.2 | 36.8 |
PaLM-Coder-540B | 36.0 | 47.0 |
PaLM 2-S | 37.6 | 50.0 |
CodeGen-16B-Mono | 29.3 | 35.3 |
Code-Cushman-001 | 33.5 | 45.9 |
StarCoder-15B | 33.6 | 43.6* |
InstructCodeT5+ | 35.0 | -- |
WizardLM-30B 1.0 | 37.8 | -- |
WizardCoder-15B 1.0 | 57.3 | 51.8 |
❗ Note: The reproduced result of StarCoder on MBPP.
❗ Note: The above table conducts a comprehensive comparison of our WizardCoder with other models on the HumanEval and MBPP benchmarks. We adhere to the approach outlined in previous studies by generating 20 samples for each problem to estimate the pass@1 score and evaluate with the same code . The scores of GPT4 and GPT3.5 reported by OpenAI are 67.0 and 48.1 (maybe these are the early version GPT4&3.5).
We welcome everyone to use your professional and difficult instructions to evaluate WizardCoder, and show us examples of poor performance and your suggestions in the issue discussion area. We are focusing on improving the Evol-Instruct now and hope to relieve existing weaknesses and issues in the the next version of WizardCoder. After that, we will open the code and pipeline of up-to-date Evol-Instruct algorithm and work with you together to improve it.
Online Demo
Fine-tuning
Inference
Evaluation
Citation
Disclaimer
We will provide our latest models for you to try for as long as possible. If you find a link is not working, please try another one. At the same time, please try as many real-world and challenging code-related problems that you encounter in your work and life as possible. We will continue to evolve our models with your feedbacks.
We fine-tune WizardCoder using the modified code train.py from Llama-X . We fine-tune StarCoder-15B with the following hyperparameters:
Hyperparameter | StarCoder-15B |
---|---|
Batch size | 512 |
Learning rate | 2e-5 |
Epochs | 3 |
Max length | 2048 |
Warmup step | 30 |
LR scheduler | cosine |
To reproduce our fine-tuning of WizardCoder, please follow the following steps:
huggingface-cli login
deepspeed train_wizardcoder.py \ --model_name_or_path "bigcode/starcoder" \ --data_path "/your/path/to/code_instruction_data.json" \ --output_dir "/your/path/to/ckpt" \ --num_train_epochs 3 \ --model_max_length 2048 \ --per_device_train_batch_size 16 \ --per_device_eval_batch_size 1 \ --gradient_accumulation_steps 4 \ --evaluation_strategy "no" \ --save_strategy "steps" \ --save_steps 50 \ --save_total_limit 2 \ --learning_rate 2e-5 \ --warmup_steps 30 \ --logging_steps 2 \ --lr_scheduler_type "cosine" \ --report_to "tensorboard" \ --gradient_checkpointing True \ --deepspeed configs/deepspeed_config.json \ --fp16 True
We provide the decoding script for WizardCoder, which reads a input file and generates corresponding responses for each sample, and finally consolidates them into an output file.
You can specify base_model , input_data_path and output_data_path in src\inference_wizardcoder.py to set the decoding model, path of input file and path of output file.
pip install jsonlines
The decoding command is:
python src\inference_wizardcoder.py \ --base_model "/your/path/to/ckpt" \ --input_data_path "/your/path/to/input/data.jsonl" \ --output_data_path "/your/path/to/output/result.jsonl"
The format of data.jsonl should be:
{"idx": 11, "Instruction": "Write a Python code to count 1 to 10."} {"idx": 12, "Instruction": "Write a Jave code to sum 1 to 10."}
The prompt for our WizardCoder in src\inference_wizardcoder.py is:
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: {instruction} ### Response:
We provide the evaluation script on HumanEval for WizardCoder.
model="/path/to/your/model" temp=0.2 max_len=2048 pred_num=200 num_seqs_per_iter=2 output_path=preds/T${temp}_N${pred_num} mkdir -p ${output_path} echo 'Output path: '$output_path echo 'Model to eval: '$model # 164 problems, 21 per GPU if GPU=8 index=0 gpu_num=8 for ((i = 0; i < $gpu_num; i++)); do start_index=$((i * 21)) end_index=$(((i + 1) * 21)) gpu=$((i)) echo 'Running process #' ${i} 'from' $start_index 'to' $end_index 'on GPU' ${gpu} ((index++)) ( CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=$gpu python humaneval_gen.py --model ${model} \ --start_index ${start_index} --end_index ${end_index} --temperature ${temp} \ --num_seqs_per_iter ${num_seqs_per_iter} --N ${pred_num} --max_len ${max_len} --output_path ${output_path} ) & if (($index % $gpu_num == 0)); then wait; fi done
output_path=preds/T${temp}_N${pred_num} echo 'Output path: '$output_path python process_humaneval.py --path ${output_path} --out_path ${output_path}.jsonl --add_prompt evaluate_functional_correctness ${output_path}.jsonl
Please cite the repo if you use the data or code in this repo.
@misc{luo2023wizardcoder, title={WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct}, author={Ziyang Luo and Can Xu and Pu Zhao and Qingfeng Sun and Xiubo Geng and Wenxiang Hu and Chongyang Tao and Jing Ma and Qingwei Lin and Daxin Jiang}, year={2023}, }
The resources, including code, data, and model weights, associated with this project are restricted for academic research purposes only and cannot be used for commercial purposes. The content produced by any version of WizardCoder is influenced by uncontrollable variables such as randomness, and therefore, the accuracy of the output cannot be guaranteed by this project. This project does not accept any legal liability for the content of the model output, nor does it assume responsibility for any losses incurred due to the use of associated resources and output results.