数据集:
GEM/viggo
任务:
表格到文本语言:
en计算机处理:
unknown语言创建人:
unknown批注创建人:
none源数据集:
original其他:
data-to-text许可:
cc-by-sa-4.0You can find the main data card on the GEM Website .
ViGGO is an English data-to-text generation dataset in the video game domain, with target responses being more conversational than information-seeking, yet constrained to the information presented in a meaning representation. The dataset is relatively small with about 5,000 datasets but very clean, and can thus serve for evaluating transfer learning, low-resource, or few-shot capabilities of neural models.
You can load the dataset via:
import datasets data = datasets.load_dataset('GEM/viggo')
The data loader can be found here .
website paper authorsJuraj Juraska, Kevin K. Bowden, Marilyn Walker
@inproceedings{juraska-etal-2019-viggo, title = "{V}i{GGO}: A Video Game Corpus for Data-To-Text Generation in Open-Domain Conversation", author = "Juraska, Juraj and Bowden, Kevin and Walker, Marilyn", booktitle = "Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation", month = oct # "{--}" # nov, year = "2019", address = "Tokyo, Japan", publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-8623", doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-8623", pages = "164--172", }Contact Name
Juraj Juraska
Contact Emailjjuraska@ucsc.edu
Has a Leaderboard?no
no
Covered LanguagesEnglish
Licensecc-by-sa-4.0: Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
Intended UseViGGO was designed for the task of data-to-text generation in chatbots (as opposed to task-oriented dialogue systems), with target responses being more conversational than information-seeking, yet constrained to the information presented in a meaning representation. The dataset, being relatively small and clean, can also serve for demonstrating transfer learning capabilities of neural models.
Primary TaskData-to-Text
academic
Curation Organization(s)University of California, Santa Cruz
Dataset CreatorsJuraj Juraska, Kevin K. Bowden, Marilyn Walker
Who added the Dataset to GEM?Juraj Juraska
Each example in the dataset has the following two fields:
Each MR is a flattened dictionary of attribute-and-value pairs, "wrapped" in the dialogue act type indication. This format was chosen primarily for its compactness, but also to allow for easy concatenation of multiple DAs (each with potentially different attributes) in a single MR.
Following is the list of all possible attributes (which are also refered to as "slots") in ViGGO along with their types/possible values:
Each MR in the dataset has 3 distinct reference utterances, which are represented as 3 separate examples with the same MR.
Reason for StructureThe dataset structure mostly follows the format of the popular E2E dataset, however, with added dialogue act type indications, new list-type attributes introduced, and unified naming convention for multi-word attribute names.
Example Instance{ "mr": "give_opinion(name[SpellForce 3], rating[poor], genres[real-time strategy, role-playing], player_perspective[bird view])", "ref": "I think that SpellForce 3 is one of the worst games I've ever played. Trying to combine the real-time strategy and role-playing genres just doesn't work, and the bird view perspective makes it near impossible to play." }Data Splits
ViGGO is split into 3 partitions, with no MRs in common between the training set and either of the validation and the test set (and that after delexicalizing the name and developer slots). The ratio of examples in the partitions is approximately 7.5 : 1 : 1.5, with their exact sizes listed below:
Note: The reason why the number of unique MRs is not exactly one third of all examples is that for each request_attribute DA (which only has one slot, and that without a value) 12 reference utterances were collected instead of 3.
Splitting CriteriaA similar MR length and slot distribution was preserved across the partitions. The distribution of DA types, on the other hand, is skewed slightly toward fewer inform DA instances (the most prevalent DA type) and a higher proportion of the less prevalent DAs in the validation and the test set.
{ "mr": "request_attribute(player_perspective[])", "ref": "Is there a certain player perspective that you prefer over others in games you play?" }, { "mr": "inform(name[FIFA 12], esrb[E (for Everyone)], genres[simulation, sport], player_perspective[bird view, side view], platforms[PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, PC], available_on_steam[no])", "ref": "Fifa 12 is a decent sports simulator. It's pretty cool how the game swaps from the bird's eye perspective down to a side view while you're playing. You can get the game for PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo consoles, and PC, but unfortunately it's not on Steam. Of course, as a sports game there's not much objectionable content so it's rated E." }, { "mr": "inform(name[Super Bomberman], release_year[1993], genres[action, strategy], has_multiplayer[no], platforms[Nintendo, PC], available_on_steam[no], has_linux_release[no], has_mac_release[no])", "ref": "Super Bomberman is one of my favorite Nintendo games, also available on PC, though not through Steam. It came out all the way back in 1993, and you can't get it for any modern consoles, unfortunately, so no online multiplayer, or of course Linux or Mac releases either. That said, it's still one of the most addicting action-strategy games out there." }
ViGGO is a fairly small dataset but includes a greater variety of utterance types than most other datasets for NLG from structured meaning representations. This makes it more interesting from the perspective of model evaluation, since models have to learn to differentiate between various dialogue act types that share the same slots.
Similar Datasetsyes
Unique Language Coverageno
Difference from other GEM datasetsViGGO's language is more casual and conversational -- as opposed to information-seeking -- which differentiates it from the majority of popular datasets for the same type of data-to-text task. Moreover, the video game domain is a rather uncommon one in the NLG community, despite being very well-suited for data-to-text generation, considering it offers entities with many attributes to talk about, which can be described in a structured format.
no
Additional Splits?no
BLEU , METEOR , ROUGE , BERT-Score , BLEURT , Other: Other Metrics
Other MetricsSER (slot error rate): Indicates the proportion of missing/incorrect/duplicate/hallucinated slot mentions in the utterances across a test set. The closer to zero a model scores in this metric, the more semantically accurate its outputs are. This metric is typically calculated either manually on a small sample of generated outputs, or heuristically using domain-specific regex rules and gazetteers.
Previous results available?yes
Relevant Previous ResultsThe primary motivation behind ViGGO was to create a data-to-text corpus in a new but conversational domain, and intended for use in open-domain chatbots rather than task-oriented dialogue systems. To this end, the dataset contains utterances of 9 generalizable and conversational dialogue act types, revolving around various aspects of video games. The idea is that similar, relatively small datasets could fairly easily be collected for other conversational domains -- especially other entertainment domains (such as music or books), but perhaps also topics like animals or food -- to support an open-domain conversational agent with controllable neural NLG.
Another desired quality of the ViGGO dataset was cleanliness (no typos and grammatical errors) and semantic accuracy, which has often not been the case with other crowdsourced data-to-text corpora. In general, for the data-to-text generation task, there is arguably no need to put the burden on the generation model to figure out the noise, since the noise would not be expected to be there in a real-world system whose dialogue manager that creates the input for the NLG module is usually configurable and tightly controlled.
Communicative GoalProduce a response from a structured meaning representation in the context of a conversation about video games. It can be a brief opinion or a description of a game, as well as a request for attribute (e.g., genre, player perspective, or platform) preference/confirmation or an inquiry about liking a particular type of games.
Sourced from Different Sourcesno
Crowdsourced
Where was it crowdsourced?Amazon Mechanical Turk
Language ProducersThe paid crowdworkers who produced the reference utterances were from English-speaking countries, and they had at least 1,000 HITs approved and a HIT approval rate of 98% or more. Furthermore, in the instructions, crowdworkers were discouraged from taking on the task unless they considered themselves a gamer.
Topics CoveredThe dataset focuses on video games and their various aspects, and hence the language of the utterances may contain video game-specific jargon.
Data Validationvalidated by data curator
Data PreprocessingFirst, regular expressions were used to enforce several standardization policies regarding special characters, punctuation, and the correction of undesired abbreviations/misspellings of standard domain-specific terms (e.g., terms like "Play station" or "PS4" would be changed to the uniform "PlayStation"). At the same time, hyphens were removed or enforced uniformly in certain terms, for example, "single-player". Although phrases such as "first person" should correctly have a hyphen when used as adjective, the crowdworkers used this rule very inconsistently. In order to avoid model outputs being penalized during the evaluation by the arbitrary choice of a hyphen presence or absence in the reference utterances, the hyphen was removed in all such phrases regardless of the noun vs. adjective use.
Second, an extensive set of heuristics was developed to identify slot-related errors. This process revealed the vast majority of missing or incorrect slot mentions, which were subsequently fixed according to the corresponding MRs. This eventually led to the development of a robust, cross-domain, heuristic slot aligner that can be used for automatic slot error rate evaluation. For details, see the appendix in Juraska and Walker, 2021 .
Crowdworkers would sometimes also inject a piece of information which was not present in the MR, some of which is not even represented by any of the slots, e.g., plot or main characters. This unsolicited information was removed from the utterances so as to avoid confusing the neural model. Finally, any remaining typos and grammatical errors were resolved.
Was Data Filtered?manually
Filter CriteriaCompliance with the indicated dialogue act type, semantic accuracy (i.e., all information in the corresponding MR mentioned and that correctly), and minimal extraneous information (e.g., personal experience/opinion). Whenever it was within a reasonable amount of effort, the utterances were manually fixed instead of being discarded/crowdsourced anew.
none
Annotation Service?no
no
no PII
Justification for no PIICrowdworkers were instructed to only express the information in the provided meaning representation, which never prompted them to mention anything about themselves. Occasionally, they would still include a bit of personal experience (e.g., "I used to like the game as a kid.") or opinion, but these would be too general to be considered PII.
no
no
no
no
The dataset is limited to a single domain: video games. One caveat of using a language generator trained on this dataset in a dialogue system as-is is that multiple subsequent turns discussing the same video game would be repeating its full name. ViGGO was designed for generation without context, and therefore it is up to the dialogue manager to ensure that pronouns are substituted for the names whenever it would sound more natural in a dialogue. Alternately, the dataset can easily be augmented with automatically constructed samples which omit the name slot in the MR and replace the name with a pronoun in the reference utterance.